Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Lifestyle and New Media

Laurence Desarzens, urban communicator, beatmap.com
Media & communication specialist for lifestyle companies




Laurence is a Thought Leader in the
LAB on MEDIA and Human Experience
An immersed experience of a Do-Tank
May 29 & 30, 2007
Location: Girona near Barcelona, Spain
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/event.asp?contentid=657

Club of Amsterdam: Laurence - you are in close touch with youth culture - this from a cultural as well as commercial involvement. Lifestyle is more and more the defining factor for new media. Can you give us some examples how young "urban tribes" are dealing with communication and media at large?

First I think we should talk once about the definition of what is “youth” today. Maybe “youth” is less related to an age group and more to a lifestyle. Keeping this in mind … Using new media (which essentially are tools) need time, that’s certainly why it influence your lifestyle. And for sure if you are using these tools you keep in contact to your network and group. That’s what allows you to learn, share and exchange, work, be cool ;). You use mobile, internet, constantly and everywhere, you communicate constantly. So everything influences everything to give birth to colourful, and creative trends in all fields, who constantly evolve. These trends can also be scary and dark off course. It’s the people and not the media who are defining the content. Or is it really ;)

Youth tribes fluidly use all means of new technologies to surf what can be of their very specific interests NOW. They double-check validity, relevance and credibility with their friends faster than the speed of light. They copy, they fake, because the tools are theirs to do so, and why not. They use what is the most convenient for them to communicate … internet, gsm, whatever.

You will see website about specific cultures interests: skate, sneaker culture, music, who can bloom in a very short time. You see trends come, go and come back, and mutate. If you take people in hip hop music, you have young producers doing beats, exchanging and working cross borders. Influenced by anything. So they use all these tools whatever they are … AIM, Skype you name it.

In hip hop and really in all subcultures it’s simply amazing to see all these mosaic of ideas, tastes and styles developing and exchanging via new media. If main media are not interested they create their own. Look at record label like Stones Throw for example … or Ninja Tune … They build shops, platform, and post. There are many examples besides my space and you tube. Sneakerplay.com is a sneaker community for example, or the fashion blogs who are now giving “the ton” somewhere to print media such as Vogue, it’s “le monde a l’envers”.


Club of Amsterdam: Improved bandwidth allows to distribute content through Internet and wireless close to dvd quality. This means a radical change of the media landscape. Can you give us examples of "everybody can be a tv station" etc?

What defines a TV station? If it’s about making programs at regular time, with specific subjects, selected and where the information is provided via a journalistic approach, I think it then to have more bandwidth doesn’t necessarily facilitate. But if it’s posting moving images about specific subjects then certainly with bandwidth availability we see an explosion of the worst and the best DIY TV online. Like TV on demand.

In wide interests website like www.youporn.com show what is happening when bandwidth and tools are available to everyone … I let you guess, sex definitely is the huge potential for online TV … on the other hand of the ethical spectrum you have a site like www.godtube.com which is for the Christians community.

For entertainment www.heavy.com was there pretty early on, and can be seen as TV on demand with lot of ads, special shows, like TV on demand again. Many subcultures used the bandwidth available to document their products, lifestyles or visions, from skateboard to graffiti, and off course hip hop . That’s what’s interesting regarding my own interests. But is it TV or not?


Club of Amsterdam: What do you expect from a dialogue about media and human experience?

Enhance my knowledge and my network on all levels. Seen the volume of information we need to exchange to proof the intel we get. You are nothing without the others. So I would like to define collaborative visions based on respect and openness or how to optimize these processes, we need to go over the clichés, the fear, we need to admit we can’t have it all, and we don’t need to have it all. I just need to be able to plug in. So it’s about keeping the network open. And respect again.


Thank you Laurence!

3 Comments:

Blogger MauiMacMan said...

Speaking of TV Stations, we are all (those of us into computers) potentially broadcasters. My work is about creating opportunities for the positive use of media. Since this post is about Lifestyle, I thought I'd introduce my project to you and invite your participation (dear reader):

KidCast for Peace; Solutions for a Better World is a multipoint video conference that happens on Earth Day April 22. The project invites young people to make art illustrating what we can do to bring more peace, love, harmony and healing to our planet and its peoples, and sharing it interactively along with smiles and peace signs.

Please consider participation and helping future broadcasters participate by exploring the details in KidCast Central describing this PEACE PORTAL on the Internet and how to play:

http://creativity.net/KidCast/

I produce this project as a labor of love. Donations are requested as is cooperation and collaboration. Please spread the word!

April 15, 2007 2:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Evan Andersen

One of the ways I watch TV is through a small glass window. People say that Evan Andersen in the weirdest in Life Style but I have to admit, I am Evan Andersen.

Evan Andersen

December 10, 2007 7:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

audry

It should be that a web 2.0 does become part of the TV experience. It could be like looking through a glass window as evan andersen explains, but he misses the point that a whole new social medium is out there that could revelutionize the way we interact with our TVs. Maybe Evan Andersen needs to just get in there and have some real life experiences with the boob tube.

audry

April 23, 2008 1:49 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home